eTI-True Indian Community:Talk at India Forums:News, Sports, Television, Movies, Computer, Telecom, Indian Issues.

July 04, 2009, 05:33:00 AM
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Get Useful Updates in Email

Enter your email address:

Play Games on eTI

Play Games Now

Beat Highscores, compete against other online players and friends & lots of fun.
5 Best Players
ico
- Taquaddus with 39 Wins
ico
- mailkrishnaj with 15 Wins
ico
- killjam with 13 Wins
ico
- karthick with 13 Wins
ico
- Pandit with 10 Wins
Random game

ico
Champion: AMITTYAGI1 - 1804
Game of Day
sssss
Champion: mailkrishnaj - 36980
Search eTalkindia.com
Ā 

Members
Total Members: 9501
Latest: talk2talk
Stats
Total Posts: 12241
Total Topics: 3183
Online Today: 120
Online Ever: 351
(July 04, 2008, 04:55:01 AM)
Users Online
Users: 2
Guests: 112
Total: 114
eTI is one of the most informative community driven website, enhancing your knowledge as well as providing expert advice. You can JOIN eTI to get its full benefits.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: jodha akbar is just a movie at all  (Read 728 times)
deepika
Newbie

Offline Offline

Posts: 1


View Profile
« on: March 05, 2008, 07:04:58 AM »

my problem is that in my views jodha akbar is just a entertainment movie at all. People protesting it why?
Logged
Welcome Guest! Please login or register to give your reply / comment here or to ask your own questions.
Ricky
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1653



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 05, 2008, 01:34:16 PM »

Welcome to eTI Deepika.

Movie no doubt, is entertaining in its presentation and other aspects also. But if you note, then you will see that they have given citation that such thing happened at such and such time and so on..
This is disturbing for many, for few communities also. 
Just try to be in place of some Historian who is well awared about facts of History and then you can feel the frustration when HISTORY is mended the way they wanted just for the sake of money. 

They should have used some disclaimer that this picturization is just for the purpose of entertainment and there may be some addition / removal of artificial sequences. Just for instance, the character of Ila Arun  is I guess no where discussed in history, there is no citation about that character.

I do not remember if they have used such disclaimer in the movie.
Logged
Welcome Guest! Please login or register to give your reply / comment here or to ask your own questions.
nykw55
Newbie

Offline Offline

Posts: 14


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 26, 2008, 08:55:55 PM »

Yes, I would say this movie is only for those who like to watch only costumes, jewellery & good locations. Otherwise the film wasn't impressing about the history at all. And oh, what to say about Hrithik & Ash, not at all good acting as it required for the historical film. Actually they are not suitable for this character at all. There should have been someone who could have portrayed the royal family in a royal way. They both were no way near enough to the meaning of Jodha Akbar
Logged
Welcome Guest! Please login or register to give your reply / comment here or to ask your own questions.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

eTalkIndia © 2007 : eTalkIndia.com MGCyber Group

The eTalkIndia.com, or any other entity, company, or organisation(s) associated with the eTalkIndia.com and the hosting and/or funding of this site, cannot be held responsible for text, images and/or other material posted by users of this forum. All trademarks & logos belongs to their respective owners. Material provided here is only for informational purpose, we do not take any guarantee for its authenticity and usability. Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Manuscript TinyPortal v0.9.7 © Bloc
Close Looking for EXPERT Advice or just looking for entertainment and Fun. Join one of the most exciting community on Internet
Click HERE to Join eTI- eTalkIndia.com