eTI-True Indian Community:India Forums

March 18, 2010, 04:36:57 PM
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Ask the Experts
Ask a Question Now

Play Games Now

Beat Highscores, compete against other online players and friends & lots of fun.
5 Best Players
ico
- ronycat007 with 75 Wins
ico
- matt209 with 34 Wins
ico
- Pandit with 6 Wins
ico
- killjam with 6 Wins
ico
- Taquaddus with 6 Wins
Random game

ico
*****
Champion: surjeet kaur - 4365
Game of Day
sssss
Champion: ronycat007 - 37010
Search eTalkindia.com
 

Members
Total Members: 13859
Latest: hemant1070
Stats
Total Posts: 19941
Total Topics: 5530
Online Today: 120
Online Ever: 351
(July 04, 2008, 02:25:01 PM)
Users Online
Users: 1
Guests: 178
Total: 179
Information for

INDIA: Botched Oppurtunities and lethargic reforms.

Pages: [1]
  Reply  |  Ask a Question or Post a Topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: INDIA: Botched Oppurtunities and lethargic reforms.  (Read 704 times)
Pluto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 276


View Profile
« on: July 02, 2008, 07:47:45 PM »
Reply with quoteQuote

India's Economy Hits the Wall
Growth is slipping, stocks are down 40%, and foreign stock market investors are fleeing. Businessmen blame the ruling coalition for failing to make reforms

Business Week
India July 1, 2008, 7:28AM EST

Just six months ago, India was looking good. Annual growth was 9%, corporate profits were surging 20%, the stock market had risen 50% in 2007, consumer demand was huge, local companies were making ambitious international acquisitions, and foreign investment was growing. Nothing, it seemed, could stop the forward march of this Asian nation.

But stop it has. In the past month, India has joined the list of the wounded. The country is reeling from 11.4% inflation, large government deficits, and rising interest rates. Foreign investment is fleeing, the rupee is falling, and the stock market is down over 40% from the year's highs. Most economic forecasts expect growth to slow to 7%—a big drop for a country that needs to accelerate growth, not reduce it. "India has gone from hero to zero in six months," says Andrew Holland, head of proprietary trading at Merrill Lynch India (MER) in Mumbai. Many in India worry that the country's hard-earned investment-grade rating will soon be lost and that the gilded growth story has come to an end.

Global circumstances—soaring oil prices and the subprime crisis that dried up the flow of foreign funds—are certainly to blame. But so is New Delhi. Much of the crisis India faces today could have been avoided by skillful planning. India imports 75% of its oil to meet demand, which have grown exponentially as its economy expands. The government also subsidizes 60% of the price of such fuels as diesel. In 2007, when inflation was a low 3%, economists such as Standard & Poor's Subir Gokarn urged New Delhi to start cutting subsidies. Instead, the populist ruling Congress government spent $25 billion on waiving loans made to farmers and hiking bureaucrats' salaries.

Botched Opportunities

Now those expenditures, plus an additional $25 billion on upcoming fertilizer subsidies, is adding $100 billion a year—or 10% of India's gross domestic product, or equivalent to the country's entire collection of income taxes—to the national bill. This at a time when India needs urgently to spend $500 billion on new infrastructure and more on upgrading education and health-care facilities. The government's official debt, which dropped below 6% of gross domestic product last year, will now be closer to 10% this year. "Starting last year, the government missed key opportunities" to fix the economy, says Gokarn. In fact, he adds, "there has been no significant reform done at all in the past four years"—the time the Congress coalition has been in power.

Even the most bullish on India are hard-pressed to recall any significant economic reforms made in the recent past. A plan to build 30 Special Economic Zones is virtually suspended because New Delhi has not sorted out how to acquire the necessary land, a major issue in both urban and rural India, without a major social and political upheaval. Agriculture, distorted by fertilizer subsidies and technologically laggard, is woefully unproductive. Simple and nonpolitical reforms, like strengthening the legal system and adding more judges to the courtrooms, have been ignored.

A June 16 report by Goldman Sachs' (GS) Jim O'Neill and Tushar Poddar, Ten Things for India to Achieve Its 2050 Potential, is a grim reminder that India has fallen to the bottom of the four BRIC nations (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) in its growth scores, due largely to government inertia. The report states that India's rice yields are a third those of China and half of Vietnam's. While 60% of the country's labor force is employed in agriculture, farming contributes less than 1% to overall growth. The report urges India to improve governance, raise educational achievement, and control inflation. It also advises reining in profligate expenditures, liberalizing its financial markets, increasing agricultural productivity, and improving infrastructure, the environment, and energy use. "The will to implement all these needs leadership," points out Poddar.
Logged
Welcome Guest! Please login or register to give your reply / comment here or to ask your own questions.
mdchaskar
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 19


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 05, 2008, 09:57:00 AM »
Reply with quoteQuote

It's simply the composit effect of 4 and 1/2 year's Rule of a coalition Govt.
Logged
Welcome Guest! Please login or register to give your reply / comment here or to ask your own questions.
nagarjun12
Newbie

Offline Offline

Posts: 11


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 10, 2008, 02:51:37 PM »
Reply with quoteQuote

hi
Logged
Welcome Guest! Please login or register to give your reply / comment here or to ask your own questions.
taazakhabar
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 15


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 21, 2008, 11:51:35 AM »
Reply with quoteQuote

Sure... in the post world war scenario in the mid 40s ... Japan was nothing but a heap of scrap, in terms of economic progress Singapore, Thailand or Malaysia were nowhere on the radar. At the time when India got independence, even after the division of assets between India and Pakistan, both these newly formed countries were better off than quite a few others around the globe. Look at the situation now, where are Japan, Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia and where are we in terms human development index. Do India and Pakistan suffer from a common hereditary disease?
Logged
Welcome Guest! Please login or register to give your reply / comment here or to ask your own questions.
Pages: [1]
  Reply  |  Ask a Question or Post a Topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

+ Quick Reply
With a Quick-Reply you can use bulletin board code and smileys as you would in a normal post, but much more conveniently.

eTalkIndia © 2007 : eTalkIndia.com MGCyber Group

The eTalkIndia.com, or any other entity, company, or organisation(s) associated with the eTalkIndia.com and the hosting and/or funding of this site, cannot be held responsible for text, images and/or other material posted by users of this forum. All trademarks & logos belongs to their respective owners. Material provided here is only for informational purpose, we do not take any guarantee for its authenticity and usability. Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Manuscript TinyPortal v0.9.7 © Bloc
Close Looking for EXPERT Advice or just looking for entertainment and Fun. Join one of the most exciting community on Internet
Click HERE to Join eTI- eTalkIndia.com